The cold season alternating winter and spring is a period of high incidence of cardiovascular diseases. Many people are thinking about doing some what to prevent stroke and myocardial infarction.
There are many middle-aged and elderly friends who will be fooled by some doctors to [take intravenous drip to recuperate].
Because some doctors will suggest:
At the beginning of the year, infusion lasted for one course of treatment, and blood vessels were not blocked all year round!
In fact, the antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and hypoglycemic drugs that should be taken should be taken according to the doctor’s advice, and then the living habits of staying away from alcohol and tobacco, moderate exercise, low-salt and low-fat diet and regular physical examination should be developed to minimize the risk of cardiovascular diseases.
Dr. Clove wanted to say:
The annual intravenous drip cannot [promote blood circulation, remove blood stasis and dredge blood vessels], nor can it be used to prevent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases.
The doctor who suggested you do this is extremely irresponsible, either stupid or bad!
Why [stupid]?
First, let’s have a brief understanding of what [vascular blockage] is.
With the increase of age, lipid and necrotic tissue gradually accumulate under the intima of blood vessels, and vascular wall tissue proliferates and calcifies, which will narrow the inner diameter of blood vessels or even completely block them.
The process of blockage is very complicated and long. It is expected to be improved by one or two drugs in the short term and will not work at all.
The mechanism does not make sense, so it is naturally impossible to find any proposal for [infusion to dredge blood vessels, reduce the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, and prevent the occurrence of diseases] by going through the relevant guidelines for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases.
Let’s look at the current popular vascular drugs, which are mostly so-called [promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis] injections such as compound Salvia miltiorrhiza, breviscapine, Shuxuening and Mailuoning. Their common characteristic is that there is no conclusive research evidence or statistical data to prove their effectiveness.
Clinically, the [thrombolytic] drugs that really work have strict indications and time limits for use, and must not be used so casually.
That is to say, the matter of [infusion to prevent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases] does not make sense in principle, there is no basis in the prevention guidelines, and there is no practical research evidence to support it.
Under such circumstances, the doctor who also suggested [intravenous drip] is really stupid.
With such a professional level, who gives you the confidence to receive patients? And what’s vow to face the beginning of his medical studies [health is tied to life]?
The statement of “losing a course of treatment for one year” is simply self-deception! However, if a doctor knows clearly that [infusion to flush blood vessels] is useless and advises people to do so, it is really broken.
What is [bad]?
On the one hand, let outstanding colleagues bear the blame.
He deceived the patient into collecting the money. When the doctor who really thinks of the patient gives the correct advice, the patient is confused:
Other doctors recommend intravenous drip, why do you say no? Who is right?
Colleagues are angry and helpless:
-Every time I follow the big brothers and sisters who come to flush blood vessels to lower blood pressure but do not take antihypertensive drugs, they explain that they are thirsty and thankless in their efforts. Then they are complained and roll their eyes unhappily. I am also very tired.
-As a doctor, I will explain to them who came to the infusion. They just don’t listen to the infusion. Otherwise, they will complain to us. It’s really helpless.
-In recent years, the pseudoscientific theory of regular infusion has really puzzled many people. Every spring or late autumn, many elderly people come to the department for infusion for safety, which is really superfluous…
The doctor-patient relationship deteriorated and medical incidents occurred frequently. When some people in white coats were spitting out patients, did they ever think that it was what you did that hurt the patients and brought trouble to their peers?
The part of doctors and patients you have caused distrust, but the conscientious and responsible people in the industry should bear it with you. This is bad!
What is even more [evil] is that such treatment will make patients take risks in vain.
- First of all, repeated intravenous infusion may cause phlebitis, liver injury or dizziness and other adverse reactions. Therefore, when there are clear indications, Before choosing infusion, Otherwise, you will take the risk for nothing. Wouldn’t it be too unjust? Secondly, Overemphasis on the preventive effect of short-term infusion, Let many people do not attach importance to rational drug use at ordinary times, Expect to take fluids once or twice a year to prevent it, This practice has greatly increased the risk of the disease. Moreover, Friends who need drugs to control chronic diseases at ordinary times, Hastily inject additional liquid medicine, It will change the concentration of drugs in the blood. Delay in controlling the disease, not to mention, will also increase the burden on the kidney, adding to the risk of renal failure. Patients with poor heart, casual infusion is also easy to induce heart failure. Finally, some of the Chinese patent medicine injections mentioned earlier may cause allergy-severe allergy can lead to shock and life-threatening!
I often hear readers report that when I go to the hospital to see a doctor, I hate to hear doctors say:
I told you that you didn’t understand.
Why do you ask so many questions? Do you not believe me?
Are you a doctor or am I a doctor? Listen to you or to me?
Here, I would like to say to those doctors who prescribe the treatment plan of [infusion and blood vessels to prevent cardiac and cerebral infarction]:
You don’t even know how to cure the disease yourself. With what, let the patients believe you? With this ineffective and risky plan?
This [professional level] is really sorry for that white coat. Why listen to an irresponsible doctor? The patient turned around and left, which is the most appropriate choice!
I hope readers and friends must be aware of the danger of doing so. If family members, relatives and friends around you have the idea of [infusion to flush blood vessels], share this article with them.
As for some doctors who have been [named], improve their professional level and have a long conscience.
Infusion cannot prevent blood vessel blockage, and you should not add more blockage to your peers and patients.